MTH-0001 / Decision foundation

Problem Definition and Strategic Judgment

Define the objective, constraints, time horizon and actual decision issue before choosing tools.

MTH-0001V1.1CURRENT / PUBLIC WORKING VERSION2026.07.28

METHOD POSITION

Decision foundation

Called before every domain method

WHEN TO CALL

These signals call for a structured method

  1. 01

    An opportunity or tool appears before the problem is defined

  2. 02

    Participants disagree on objective, horizon or accountability

  3. 03

    The solution grows complex while the intended outcome remains unclear

DECISION GATES

Turn the method into gates that change action

01

Objective gate

Define the result to change and its accountable owner

02

Fact gate

Separate knowns, unknowns, assumptions and disputes

03

Constraint gate

Confirm time, funding, authority, compliance and capability

04

Choice gate

Compare viable paths, including no action

05

Test gate

Predefine facts that switch, stop or overturn the path

REQUIRED OUTPUT

01One-page problem definition

02Fact–assumption–dispute table

03Action and no-action paths

04Switch and stop conditions

STOP CONDITIONS

A method must also show when not to proceed

01

No accountable outcome owner

02

Conflicting objectives remain unresolved

03

The current opportunity is treated as the only path

RELATIONSHIPS

Cases generate the method; judgments and principles constrain it

PUBLIC BOUNDARY

This is Howard's current public method structure. It does not replace project-specific finance, legal, tax, valuation, regulatory or board judgment. Thresholds, risk appetite and final decisions remain with the responsible owners using complete facts.