MTH-0004 / Outcome feedback method

Outcome Review

A cross-scenario review of judgment, execution, cycle, external shocks and luck that updates the system.

MTH-0004V1.1CURRENT / PUBLIC WORKING VERSION2026.07.28

METHOD POSITION

Outcome feedback method

Called after outcomes emerge

WHEN TO CALL

These signals call for a structured method

  1. 01

    A project improves or deteriorates temporarily

  2. 02

    The formal target is met but value is not realised

  3. 03

    The team judges the original decision only from the final result

DECISION GATES

Turn the method into gates that change action

01

Recover the ex-ante version

Freeze the facts, assumptions, choice and stop conditions known then

02

Record outcomes

Separate financial, operating, market and durable-capability results

03

Decompose causes

Assess judgment, information, execution, cycle, shocks and luck

04

Compare rejected paths

Test whether alternatives rejected then were actually inferior

05

Form a revision

Keep, strengthen, narrow, challenge, revise or retire the rule

REQUIRED OUTPUT

01Ex-ante judgment baseline

02Layered outcome record

03Outcome-attribution bridge

04Rule-revision change set

STOP CONDITIONS

A method must also show when not to proceed

01

The original information set cannot be recovered

02

An interim result is treated as final success

03

Review is used only to vindicate the original owner

RELATIONSHIPS

Cases generate the method; judgments and principles constrain it

PUBLIC BOUNDARY

This is Howard's current public method structure. It does not replace project-specific finance, legal, tax, valuation, regulatory or board judgment. Thresholds, risk appetite and final decisions remain with the responsible owners using complete facts.